Clip Art For Push And Pull When Does Censorship Go Too Far - Naked Baby Ad Rejected.?
When does censorship go too far - naked baby ad rejected.? - clip art for push and pull
I saw this news clip - Calgary Transit has released an addition to a local campaign for the Museum's exhibition of art because it provides a picture of a newborn girl's supplement, which is naked, is connected with blood and amniotic fluid and cable, covered. The quotation shows that the display "some offensive" and has offered to cultures of the spinal cord.
Do you think that the company went too far in one direction or another to push these images into or out of the ordinary?
Link: http://cosmos.bcst.yahoo.com/up/player/p ...
|
8 comments:
Yes, it is a little exaggerated. It is the art of a person and not like they show a royal birth, or is a real baby.
Art should not be censored, is to speak a violation of human rights.
lol I saw ... I could understand if it was a boy naked real, but made his advertising an art exhibition for an incredible job, it's a bit silly IMO. They had in my town show is amazing sculptor.
I really want to know how the image of a newborn is insulting to people ...
I personally find it offensive at all. It is the same as that of someone breastfeeding in public, I believe, is nature, happens all the time. Offensive to me is the announcement of the abortion clinic I see people picketing on the sidewalk with pictures of the destruction of embryos and dead babies. Now that the shit that should be censored!
I KNOW! I saw the video of this, I thought the drawing was incredibly detailed (in a good way) I really do not see why people are offended, so you is so life grow.
But the positive side, there is no bad publicity is that the artist received a lot of recognition of this good for him.
Doodle: Not a real boy, not the view of the clip? This is a sculpture, and it's really beautiful!
I really think that society is something extremein this regard. This reminds me of parents who searched for child pornography, accused of bath time for innocent pictures of their daughters. Society tends to sexualize everything, and it is really sick.
I was very excited when taken pictures of my newborn daughter on my MySpace page have been due to "violation of the terms of the agreement" ... It was a small blue and wet, of course, but no blood or mucus, you can see her umbilical cord still attatched, but how is it somehow offensive? This is a beautiful part of life I wanted to share with my family in my private page. I was very hurt and angry at the message that a picture of my beautiful daughter "receive offensive" to.
Giving birth is a part of life, and I would not call it offensive, although many people have problems with the sight of blood ..... and could be controversial for this reason.
I think one more reason to cut the ad is that sick people there, too, and then not a normal person in this advert in a sexual way, it is wrong that would be. The exploitation of children. None of us would be for a nude photo of our line for children, and there are good reasons not to do. The image of the child should be kept secret.
EDIT: I had trouble opening the clip, and I do not know it was a work of art. I do not see a problem with putting a picture of the artwork up!
I do not think it appropriate for an announcement of any kind, because it is unpleasant, not because it is shocking. There is no reason to believe that the child under any circumstances!
Post a Comment